top of page
  • Smart Paper

Grading vs Assessing: Is it a Meaningful Difference?

Updated: Aug 5, 2023

Grading student work has long been an integral task for teachers in the education system. For generations, teachers have spent countless hours score-marking assignments, exams, essays, and other student work, assigning letter grades or percentages based on performance. However, as discussed in this article on grading smarter from Edutopia, in recent years, there has been a major shift in focus towards prioritizing assessment over traditional paper grading.


A student confused about Grading vs. Assessing: Is there a Meaningful Difference?

With the rise of advanced AI solutions that enable automated grading and feedback, educators now have powerful tools to assess students in much more meaningful, multidimensional ways.


But is there truly a significant difference between grading and assessment? In this comprehensive blog post, we’ll dive deep into the key distinctions, analyze the limitations of paper grading, discuss how AI assessment tools are transforming the landscape, and make the case for why the difference is indeed meaningful in the modern digital era.


Defining Grading and Assessment


Grading

Grading is the process of a teacher examining students’ work, most commonly written assignments and tests, and assigning a numeric score or letter grade based on accuracy, completion and formatting. Once a grade is assigned, the work is handed back to the students. Grading focuses solely on the final output.


Assessment

In contrast, assessment refers to systematically evaluating students’ knowledge, skill levels, mindsets and ongoing progress or learning. As explained in Carnegie Mellon University's overview of formative vs summative assessments, effective assessments incorporate diverse methods, tools and activities - not just written work.


Well-designed assessments provide personalized feedback, enhance student outcomes and utilize formative and summative evaluations.


Limitations of Over-Reliance on Traditional Paper Grading

While grading has purposes, over-reliance on paper grading has limitations:

  • Teachers spend significant time outside of instruction grading lengthy assignments. This Forbes article on AI grading notes it's not uncommon to spend 8-12 hours on a single class set.

  • Grades give no nuanced feedback on how students can improve. Students are left unsure of problem areas, as discussed in this paper on automated essay scoring from IEEE.

  • Grades offer minimal large-scale insights for teachers to guide instructional practices, interventions or differentiation.

How AI Assessment Tools Resolve Grading Issues

Advanced AI grading and assessment platforms automate evaluation using machine learning:

  • They deliver instant, personalized feedback identifying students' strengths, gaps, and areas needing improvement.

  • AI applies consistent rules, eliminating human bias and errors.

  • This allows teachers to spend less time on repetitive grading and more on meaningful coaching, mentoring and tailored instruction.

Benefits of AI-Enabled Student Assessment

Intelligently implemented AI assessment delivers numerous benefits

  • Automating grading and feedback reduces teachers’ after-hours workloads, per this article on how AI saves teachers grading time.

  • Students receive specific feedback to focus improvement efforts, rather than just a letter grade.

  • AI systems provide grading recommendations, but teachers determine final grades based on their assessment.

Conclusion

In summary, while grading and assessment both evaluate student learning, the latter goes deeper by providing meaningful multidimensional feedback. AI solutions automate dreary grading while enhancing personalized feedback.

As this study on AI grading's impact notes, these benefits will continue growing as the technology advances. The difference between grading and AI-enhanced assessment is indeed meaningful.

5 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page